Times are displayed in (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)Change
EAF Electrode Holder Replacement via OEM, Remanufactured Design or Additive Manufacturing Repair: Assessing the Carbon Footprint, Economic Viability, Lead Times and Tooling Life Span of Each Solution
This study presents a comparative analysis of carbon emissions, cost considerations, forecasted delivery and life span average between electrode holder replacement methods for electric arc furnaces. Utilizing carbon intensity as well as water curves for copper, and a step-by-step carbon footprint calculation method, the paper explores the environmental and end user impacts of each methodology. Emphasizing the intricate relationship between resource consumption and carbon emissions, the research underscores the importance of environmental assessments within steelmaking processes. This investigation provides a foundational framework for the steel industry's transition toward more sustainable environmental practices by educating decision-makers and corresponding purchasing departments.
Eric Bryan | Precisioned Components
EAF Electrode Holder Replacement via OEM, Remanufactured Design or Additive Manufacturing Repair: Assessing the Carbon Footprint, Economic Viability, Lead Times and Tooling Life Span of Each Solution
Category
Paper and Presentation
Description
Custom CSS
double-click to edit, do not edit in source
Session: Electric Steelmaking: Electrical Projects/Upgrades to EAF Track: Electric Steelmaking Date: 5/6/2024 Room: A120/121 Presentation Time: 10:00 AM to 10:30 AM